[Tfug] Static/Dynamic (IP,name) bindings

Bexley Hall bexley401 at yahoo.com
Thu Sep 13 11:11:54 MST 2012


Hi Tyler,

--- On Thu, 9/13/12, Tyler Kilian <vaca at grazeland.com> wrote:

> Some switches have security features
> such as DHCP Snooping, that can help mitigate the threat of
> rogue DHCP servers.   Some common sense
> network segmentation can also help mitigate the issue by
> reducing the scope of issue.   The overall
> point being that there are some ways to protect yourself.

Yes, but that would only be common in enterprise scenarios.
I suspect you won't find any SOHO kit with those features!
You wouldn't want to run the risk of someone (friend/foe)
surreptitiously installing a new image in your HVAC controller
just by plugging in a rogue host that tricks the controller
into accepting a new image from *it* instead of the *real*
image server...

It seems that the only "safe" way of doing this is to use
a more secure protocol.

I'll have to keep thinking about how to *detect* this sort
of situation (as a prophylactic measure).

Thanks!
--don




More information about the tfug mailing list