[Tfug] AMD vs. Intel floating point
Brian Murphy
tfug@tfug.org
Sun Mar 30 17:43:02 2003
Quoting John Gruenenfelder <johng@bach.as.arizona.edu>:
> I am trying to put together an upgrade for a machine at work. Our
> primary concern is number crunching power, especially floating point
(lots of
> FFTs much of the time). A number of place I have read show benchmarks
> with AMD chips ahead of Intel chips in FPU performance, but finding *good*
> benchmarks is very hard.
>
> In particular, the machine is a choice between 2x Athlon MP 2600 (the
> 2700s not being available yet) or 2x Pentium 4 3Ghz. There is, of course,
> a pretty big price difference too, but more important is FPU speed.
>
> Does anybody have any good links to benchmarks either way? Any
> experience in which is better?
>
Of course the best solution is to test your code on both. You may see
things like CPU cache play a giant role depending on your program.
The SPEC tests are often cited benchmarks. See
http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/ . There is a 2600+MP Athlon in the
1st Q 2003 results and a bunch of P4s and Xeons in 4thQ 2002.
In short, the P4s look faster.
(I hope this table formats okay)
CFP2000 Rates
Company System
CPUs Base Peak
AMD Asus A7M266-D Motherboard, AMD Athlon (TM) MP 2400+ 2 10.5 11.2
AMD MSI K7D Master Motherboard, AMD Athlon (TM) MP 2600+ 2 10.4 11.0
Dell PowerEdge 6650 (2.0 GHz Xeon MP)
2 13.2 13.8
Dell Precision WorkStation 530 (2.4 GHz Xeon)
2 13.5 13.8
The AMD benchmarks also show how important a good motherboard is.
Brian
The opinions or statements expressed herein are my own and should not be
taken as a position, opinion, or endorsement of the University of Arizona.