[Tfug] warchalking
Derbe
tfug@tfug.org
Fri Jun 28 16:59:02 2002
I haven't read any replies from anyone that actually says that they have
wireless setup. I have wireless at my house and I make the choice to
share or not to share based on what I'm doing at any particular time.
If I don't want to share, I turn on WEP. When I'm gone for a period of
time I turn it off, to share it. It doesn't matter to me if someone
uses it. I don't consider it stealing as it will still be there when I
get home. If I got billed per kilobyte, that would be a different
story. So, I don't know how I would let anyone know that it's okay to
use my wireless unless I just turn off WEP.
If I chalk my own residence, is that okay?
Derbe
Tyler Kilian wrote:
> At 09:25 AM 6/28/02 -0700, Nicolas Lopez wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 07:32:20AM -0700, Tyler Kilian wrote:
>> > Bowie:
>> >
>> > We've had our ups and downs, but let me say, for what it's
>> worth...you hit
>> > the nail right on the head with this one. In fact, you used a
>> nailgun.
>> >
>> > A few things, that I know specifically:
>> >
>> > 1) There are laws governing the use of home-made antennaes
>
>
>
>
>> And there are laws governing how long you can spend in the bathroom at
>> Sizler before they send to cops in to pull you out. Just because
>> there are
>> laws it doesn't mean they say anything meaningful.
>
>
>
> Sure, it's like Sizzler. Just like at Sizzler, if someone pushes the
> issue, you can be in trouble. The whole point of the laws is not what
> happns if nobody cares to prosecute or investigate, the point is what
> happens if someone finds out and decides to press that issue.
>
>
>
>> > 2) The expectation of privacy exists with most wireless devices of this
>> > type.
>
>
>
>
>> The expectation of safety exists with idiot leaving their cars unlocked
>> just because they think they live in a "good" neighborhood too.
>> Neither have
>> much of a connection to reality.
>
>
>
> That's a lot like blaming the victim of a violent crime. "Well, he was
> in a bad area of town after dark, it's his fault." True, you need to
> take precuations, but that doesn't mean that someone breaking a law is
> exempted from responsibility. If you leave your car open and someone
> steals your linux sticker, that is theft. Period.
>
>
>
>> > 3) Attempting to procure a lease *is* accessing a network without
>> > authorization.
>
>
>
>
>> No, attempting to procure a lease, by definition, is ASKING for
>> authorization to access the network. DHCP OFFER is analogous to you
>> welcoming a hobo knocking at your door in for dinner.
>
>
>
> No, because you are tying up bandwidth, processor cycles, and then
> potentially an IP. If you came into my office without permission and
> plugged into a switch and tried to gain an IP address, that would be
> accessing my network without permission, as well as potential
> tresspass, etc. Just because it is wireless and not physically secure
> does not mean that the same rules regarding access do not apply.
>
>
>> > 4) If you try and crack WEP, this is circumventing security further
>> and has
>> > all sorts of other "hacking" and encryption laws behind it.\
>
>
>
>
>> Well duh, that's why nobody mentioned cracking WEP.
>
>
> Just a potential item of contention, that's all.
>
>
>> > A bad anology to this is scanning. There is nothing illegal about
>> > listening to
>> > radio transmissions. If you try and join in--then it's a crime.
>
>
>
>
>> There's nothing illigal about going door-to-door looking for charity
>> either.
>
>
> Unless a no-trespassing sign is posted. You can't ignore the intent
> either.
>
>
> Anyway, you'll do what you want and try to justify the non-criminal
> element of it. If you war drive the wrong place, however, don't be
> too surprised if the response you get is "tell it to the judge."
>
>
>
>
>
> # Tyler Kilian, CCNP
> # Technology Director, Dakota Communications
> # TKilian@DakotaCom.NET | 520.745.3900 x 100
>
> _______________________________________________
> tfug mailing list
> tfug@tfug.org
> https://www.tfug.org/mailman/listinfo/tfug
>