[Tfug] OT: how a technical analysis of an election actually works...

Dean Jones dean.jones at gmail.com
Thu Apr 19 09:11:45 MST 2012


On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Zack Williams <zdwzdw at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Jim March <1.jim.march at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> As there was some interest in a previous discussion, I've finished analyzing
>> the 3/13/2012 Flagstaff mayoral race based on public records access.  This
>> where the Sandisk Cruzer U3 showed up.  I wrote the records request for a
>> candidate up there, he filed it, Emailed the results, I spend a couple days
>> chewing on it.
>
> This is wacky - do they not have some system level auditing turned on
> beyond the event log?  Aren't there Common Criteria tools turned on on
> a system like this, that track what's happening on a system in fine
> grained detail?
>
>> PS: if anybody wants the source public records files to check my work I'll
>> be happy to provide.
>
> Are these considered private?  You couldn't just dump them somewhere
> like github?
>
> - Zack


Nice work!

I don't envy you staring at Windows Eventlogs that much!




More information about the tfug mailing list