[Tfug] backporting packages with Woody

[Jeremy Rogers]

H>Unless it's only one or two backports that you need, I think will have a
H>more secure system running unstable than running backports.  The
H>backports are unsupported, while unstable is rather well supported.

H>I don't know the current state of testing, Nick might be able to toss in
H>some comments about the state of security updates in testing.

Um... I was always under the impression that testing fit nicely between stable
and unstable.  This is the primary reason I use it.  Is there any reason to beleive that unstable is "more supported" or gets security patches more quickly than testing?

Jeremy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 2559 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20031125/e1657737/attachment-0001.bin