[Tfug] RHL to Fedora

[Nick Lopez]

On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 09:15:30AM -0700, Ashley Pritchard wrote:
> Being a user of RHL for the past several years, I think RHL decision to
> release thier distro to the Fedora Core project was a bad idea.
> The concept of realeasing 2 betas before the stable release apparrently is
> not a efficient way of doing things.
> I tried the 2nd beta & then upgraded to the 1st stable release. In Fedora
> Core 1 they apparently was not concerned with correcting & fix the bugs that
> the betas had.
> Fedora Core 1 is extreamly buggy maby they will fix things in the next
> genneration which is supposed to be based on the 2.6 kernel.
> here is a good article on the dissapointment that Fedora Core 1 has been:
> http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=5111

  Relax, give whatever community is going to form around Fedora time to
actally form and start doing work.  Fedora Core 1 is basically a sign-post
release. This is the point where it's no longer officiall driven by RedHat.  

  If you've been using RedHat for several years I would have though you
would know to avoid .0 releases anyway ;)

  - Nick Lopez
    spamtrap at glowingmonkey.org

  -- Randomly selected signature --
# I'm a little source code short and stout. This is my input this is my out!